Home Page of 15th
Nov 09.
Jackson4Leader.com
What is the point
of the BNP if you admit foreigners?
“The BNP must be reformed – Support the Reform Group.”
Report on “Sterlingwork”
Meeting
29th August in
the Midlands
Comment on ‘EGM’ of 17th
Aug 08 Archive and Links.
Where does it say in the Constitution
that there can be life members?
The Reform Group of the
British National Party came into being because many members,
particularly established members, were concerned by the way the Party was
run. The current leader, Nick Griffin
has, and the founder leader, John Tyndall had, enormous talent in some
directions but it seems none in others.
This has meant the Party has not been developed in a balanced
manner. Reform Group members do not
believe the propaganda put out in the Party literature that the Party is doing
well. In particular, we mention the
large number of activists who are leaving the Party and being replaced by
inexperienced people with little idea of our policies and the enormous pressure
that can be put on activists by the State.
The Major Differences between the Reform Group and
the ‘Griffin’ BNP.
1. We believe the
Party should have a Constitution and structure that is normal for an
association. This would mean that the
principal party officials would be elected and that there would be Annual
General Meetings when all members could propose resolutions and vote. In particular, the Treasurer would be
elected by the members and the Auditor would report to the members. There would be an end to the current
‘dictatorship’ whereby the Party Chairman appoints all officials of the
Party.
2. We believe
that the Party should not waste precious resources, and the time and energy of
its members, in participating in the European Parliament. MEPs have no power. We believe that the purpose of the BNP is
to gain power. It is MPs at Westminster
that have the power to make laws. All
our resources should be used to gain MPs.
3. We believe
that the Party should be organised as strong, semi-autonomous, local
constituency associations responsible for their own funds.
4. We believe
that we should make every effort to unite the various nationalist parties and
encourage members who have left the BNP to rejoin. (It should be noted that the main reason for the existence of the
various parties is the fact that many people could not work with John Tyndall
and now with Nick Griffin.) There are
not great differences in policy between the groups. A new Party Chairman is required who has a rounded personality
and the ability to get on with all members.
The
Reform Group mounted a Leadership Challenge in 2007. Stood aside to allow another group to stand in 2008. The Reform Group is currently informally
discussing, with a wide range of nationalists, a major challenge to the system
of dictatorship, which is the current BNP.
CONTACT:
mailto:info@Jackson4Leader.com
"We hold our land in trust
from our forefathers for our children and our children’s children."
19th Dec 09